&t North Country Consulting: May 2008

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

This May Be the End of Set-Top Boxes

The National Cable & Telecommunications Association has announced an agreement with Sony that will create standards for two-way televisions and "other devices" that will work without set-top boxes. Today, the set-top box provides the interaction with the cable operator. By having an industry-wide standard, the set-top boxes (and their remotes!!!!) can go away and the functionality can be provided by the TV.

Of course, "set-top box" is not an accurate description of these devices in an age of flat-panel displays. The set-top box usually sets next to or near to a TV and is more accurately described as a shelf-top box. (Mine, in fact, is a shelf-hangover box which doesn't really fit on the shelf because the cable connectors are in the back and add at least an extra inch to its depth. And don't suggest turning it backwards: then the remote sensor is hidden.)

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Follow The Great Switchover

Click here for the FCC's page on The Great Switchover. The period for comments is ending May 30--June 2 looks like a tight timeframe, but signs still point to a widespread belief it will happen (signs=gossip). The supporting documents provide the precise information.

For some reason, media coverage of this has been sparse and, in some cases, misleading. The FCC is the primary source, so its data can be relied on.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Verizon and AT&T are swapping customers in Upstate New York, Vermont, and the south. Current Unicel customers in Vermont and Upstate New York will move automatically to AT&T which will establish a presence in the region for the first time. When Verizon wound up owning Unicel last year, its GSM subscribers stood out from the CDMA subscribers of the rest of the Verizon network (which, apparently, is why they never merged them). Because AT&T is GSM, it's happy to have the Unicel customers; the other half of the swap apparently is the reverse transaction, with Verizon picking up some CDMA customers that Rural Cellular (Unicel's parent) had lying about.

Those of us with iPhones who live in the North Country have had to be very careful not to use them excessively. Although AT&T doesn't charge roaming fees, like many other companies it will close your account if you use too many roaming minutes ("too many" apparently is more than 50%, but it's not specified anywhere that I can find). My iPhone gets a perfectly good signal in Plattsburgh, but it's the Unicel signal, and so I haven't used it much. That's why I have two cell phones--one for use when I'm away from home (the iPhone), and one for here.

There's been a little coverage of this deal, but mostly just reports that it would happen "mid-year." I walked into the Unicel store in Plattsburgh a few weeks ago and asked the point-blank what was happening. They said that on June 2, they would become an AT&T store, so that seemed confirmation enough.

Because it really irks me to be paying two bills and forced to use the clunky Treo 650 from Sprint (that, in all fairness, I once thought was state-of-the-art), I've been trying to find out more. (I also am really annoyed that Sprint charges me for each text message, and in order to get a better deal, I have to sign a new contract, which makes no sense because I'm dropping the service momentarily.) And I have found more information--no thanks to the local media. (I guess that's why the good lord invented blogs and bloggers...)

If you check the AT&T coverage map (it seems to be updated at the end of each month), you'll see that AT&T is now showing coverage at the Plattsburgh airport, up in Chazy, and down in Peru. Apparently, these were areas of poor reception in the Unicel network, so it made sense for AT&T to beef them up.

I wondered if the airport signal was close enough for me to pick it up, so I made a test call a few weeks ago. The next day, I called AT&T and asked them if they saw a roaming call the previous day, and they didn't. The woman I spoke to said she showed three towers near my home that were AT&T.

Back to the map--no change. Although it seemed old--the map date was 3/31--Plattsburgh was clearly not covered by AT&T. Today, the 4/30 map appeared, and it clearly shows AT&T service in Plattsburgh. So between the test call and confirmation from AT&T and the map, it seems that indeed we have non-roaming service.

The only thing we don't have yet is number portability. My guess is that when the Unicel store becomes an AT&T store on June 2, I'll be able to move my existing phone # from Sprint to AT&T, and all will be well.

And for anyone else with an iPhone in the new AT&T coverage region, my suggestion is that you do the same thing I did. Make a test call, wait a day for the records to update, and then confirm with AT&T that it was not a roaming call. If not, you can cancel your other cell phone, but you'll have to wait (probably until June 2) if you want to port that number over to your iPhone.

Wouldn't it be nice to have local media coverage of technology? Or do we bloggers have to do it?

P.S. This appears to be a Plattsburgh story. The Burlington area on the 4/30 map does not show AT&T coverage, so maybe they're implementing it gradually. If someone from Vermont has more info, feel free to comment on this post.